Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 05:51:42PM -0400, Eric Paris (eparis@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > For some things yes, some things no. I'd have to understand where loss > > can happen to know if it's feasible. If I know loss happens in the > > sender context that's great. If it's somewhere in the middle and the > > sender doesn't immediately know it'll never be delivered, yes, I don't > > think it can solve all my needs. How many places can and skb get lost > > between the sender and the receiver? > > When queue is full or you do not have enough RAM. Both are reported at > 'sending' time. Can you ->poll() and wait reliably until the queue will accept an skb? (A few spurious EAGAINs/ENOBUFs is ok, as long as it's not the norm). -- Jamie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
