> From: 서성종 <sj1557.seo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 12:43 PM
> >
> > This patch set is intended to improve the performance of sync dentry, I
> > don't think it is a good idea to change other logic in this patch set.
> Yeah, as you said, this patch set should keep the original logic except
> for the sync related parts. The reason I left a review comment is because
> the code before this patch set allows deleted dentries to follow unused
> dentries.
Which commit changed to allow deleted dentries to follow unused dentries?
The following code still exists if without this patch set. It does not allow
deleted dentries to follow unused dentries.
> Please let me know if I missed anything.
>
> > Patch [7/10] moves the check from exfat_search_empty_slot() to
> > exfat_validate_empty_dentry_set().
> >
> > - if (hint_femp->eidx !=
> EXFAT_HINT_NONE &&
> > - hint_femp->count ==
> CNT_UNUSED_HIT) {
> > - /* unused empty group
> means
> > - * an empty group
> which includes
> > - * unused dentry
> > - */
> > - exfat_fs_error(sb,
> > - "found bogus
> dentry(%d) beyond
> > unused empty group(%d) (start_clu : %u, cur_clu : %u)",
> > - dentry,
> hint_femp->eidx,
> > - p_dir->dir,
> clu.dir);
> >
