Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Reclamation interactions with RCU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 03:09:09PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> No.  You warn and DON'T fail the allocation.  Just like lockdep warns of
> possible deadlocks but lets you continue.
> These will be found in development (mostly) and changed to use
> __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL and have appropriate error-handling paths.

And when an allocation happens that cannot be satisfied without killing
everything off? You do realize there are _lots_ of allocations where
userspace has control over the size of the allocation, via e.g. obscure
ioctls that ask for a buffer to be filled?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux