On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 15:14, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 14:16, Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Could you still apply your previous patch? I think that definitely makes
> > sense as well.
>
> Half of it is trivial (s/make_bad_inode/fuse_make_bad/).
>
> The other half is probably broken in that form (see 775c5033a0d1
> ("fuse: fix live lock in fuse_iget()")).
>
> Things get complicated, though, because the root of submounts can have
> nodeid != FUSE_ROOT_ID, yet they should have the same rules as the
> original root. Needs more thought...
Sent out a series that I think correctly handles all cases.
Thanks,
Miklos
