Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: Add reclaim type to memory.reclaim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 9:16 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 08:34:07PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > Additionally, since this patch offers a straightforward solution to
> > address the issue in container environments, would it be feasible to
> > apply this patch initially?
>
> There are lot sof other problems with this patch, but since I disagree
> with the idea of this patch, I didn't enumerate them.

Could you please provide an enumeration of the issues you've
identified?  One issue is that the reclaimed bytes may not be optimal
for slab shrinking, particularly because many dentries are freed
deferredly.

-- 
Regards
Yafang





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux