On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:52:10AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > Here's version two of the patch set. It actually compiles on both x86 > and parisc. I could do with someone to test it on arm and sh. > > The key test is how xfs behaves. What I did to recreate the problem > on parisc was simply create an 8GB xfs filesystem, use cp -a to pump > about a GB of data into it from my git trees, then unmount and run > xfs_check. Before the patches, xfs_check reports the whole fs to be > corrupt. After the patches it reports everything to be OK. > > James > I'm seeing some corruption with these patches on SH and a 4GB XFS filesystem. However, I am currently seeing other cache aliasing issues on this board anyway. I'll do some more analysis tonight, unless Paul can prove it's just my setup being weird again. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
