Re: [PATCH 0/1] Rosebush, a new hash table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 12:51:06AM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> but your distribution actually is accurate in general, golden ratio hash
> is relly nice for sequential integers. the actual problem with your test
> is that you're testing 100% occupancy - no one does that.
> 75% occupancy, siphash:
> 0: 933
> 1: 60
> 2: 6
> 3: 1
> 4: 0
> that looks about right to me.

The point is that the worst-case length grows with the size of
the table so it won't always be 3.  You need to take into account
the largest table size that you will support.

Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page:
PGP Key:

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux