Re: [PATCH] exec: Remove unnecessary ‘NULL’ values from vma

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 01:18:30PM +0800, Li zeming wrote:
> vma is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the
> assignment.

I don't really like removing explicit initializations. They don't cause
any problems and the compiler will remove redundant stores, so there's
no benefit in dropping them.

Kees Cook

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux