Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 7/8] exec: Distinguish in_execve from in_exec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 08:12:56PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!

From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 90383cc07895183c75a0db2460301c2ffd912359 ]

Just to help distinguish the fs->in_exec flag from the current->in_execve
flag, add comments in check_unsafe_exec() and copy_fs() for more
context. Also note that in_execve is only used by TOMOYO now.

These are just a whitespace changes, we should not need them.

Dropped, thanks!

--
Thanks,
Sasha




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux