Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm: correct calculation of cgroup wb's bg_thresh in wb_over_bg_thresh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 10:35:41AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> Hi Tejun, sorry for the late reply as I was on vacation these days.
> I agree that visibility is poor so I have to add some printks to debug.
> Actually, I have added per wb stats to improve the visibility as we
> only have per bdi stats (/sys/kernel/debug/bdi/xxx:x/stats) now. And I
> plan to submit it in a new series.
> I'd like to add a script to improve visibility more but I can't ensure
> the time to do it. I would submit the monitoring script with the per wb
> stats if the time problem does not bother you.

It has had poor visiblity for many many years, I don't think we're in any
hurry.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux