Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nit: this hunk would probably be better placed in the > patch at adds cifs_req_ops to fs/smb/client/file.c I've moved that to the patch that adds cifs_req_ops. David
Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nit: this hunk would probably be better placed in the > patch at adds cifs_req_ops to fs/smb/client/file.c I've moved that to the patch that adds cifs_req_ops. David