Re: [PATCH 2/3] check: add support for --list-group-tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 10:18:58AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Since the prior commit adds the ability to list groups but is used
> only when we use --start-after, let's add an option which leverages this
> to also allow us to easily query which tests are part of the groups
> specified.
> 
> This can be used for dynamic test configuration suites such as kdevops
> which may want to take advantage of this information to deterministically
> determine if a test falls part of a specific group.
> Demo:
> 
> root@demo-xfs-reflink /var/lib/xfstests # ./check --list-group-tests -g soak
> 
> generic/019 generic/388 generic/475 generic/476 generic/521 generic/522 generic/616 generic/617 generic/642 generic/648 generic/650 xfs/285 xfs/517 xfs/560 xfs/561 xfs/562 xfs/565 xfs/570 xfs/571 xfs/572 xfs/573 xfs/574 xfs/575 xfs/576 xfs/577 xfs/578 xfs/579 xfs/580 xfs/581 xfs/582 xfs/583 xfs/584 xfs/585 xfs/586 xfs/587 xfs/588 xfs/589 xfs/590 xfs/591 xfs/592 xfs/593 xfs/594 xfs/595 xfs/727 xfs/729 xfs/800

So how is this different to ./check -n -g soak?

'-n' is supposed to show you want tests are going to be run
without actually running them, so why can't you use that?

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux