On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:04:47AM +0100, Alice Ryhl wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 8:43 AM Trevor Gross <tmgross@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 5:22 AM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Of course, once a wrapper for rcu_read_lock is available, it is > > > preferable to use that over either of the two above approaches. > > > > Is this worth a FIXME? > > Shrug. I think a patch to introduce rcu_read_lock would go through the > helpers as a matter of course either way. But it also doesn't hurt. > Right. And if I understand correctly, we actually need more than RCU wrappers to "improve" the cases here: we also need the RCU interface to be inline, plus the extra maintainship of Rust version of kuids getters. These are all outside the scope of this patchset, and we may need to revisit later. The commit log here basically says: what's done in the patch is OK and probably the best way to proceed. I think it's fine. Regards, Boqun > Alice
