[PATCH] fs/hfsplus: use better @opf description

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Use a more descriptive explanation of the @opf function parameter,
more in line with <linux/blk_types.h>.

Fixes: 02105f18a26c ("fs/hfsplus: wrapper.c: fix kernel-doc warnings")
Suggested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -- a/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c b/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c
--- a/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c
+++ b/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct hfsplus_wd {
  * @sector: block to read or write, for blocks of HFSPLUS_SECTOR_SIZE bytes
  * @buf: buffer for I/O
  * @data: output pointer for location of requested data
- * @opf: request op flags
+ * @opf: I/O operation type and flags
  *
  * The unit of I/O is hfsplus_min_io_size(sb), which may be bigger than
  * HFSPLUS_SECTOR_SIZE, and @buf must be sized accordingly. On reads




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux