On 2024-02-08 16:21, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 13:49:02 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Fix a leak on dax_add_host() error, where "goto out_cleanup_dax" is done before setting pmem->dax_dev, which therefore issues the two following calls on NULL pointers: out_cleanup_dax: kill_dax(pmem->dax_dev); put_dax(pmem->dax_dev);Seems inappropriate that this fix is within this patch series? otoh I assume dax_add_host() has never failed so it doesn't matter much. The series seems useful but is at v4 without much sign of review activity. I think I'll take silence as assent and shall slam it all into -next and see who shouts at me.
Thanks Andrew for picking it up! Dan just reacted with feedback that will help reducing the patch series size by removing intermediate commits. I'll implement the requested changes and post a v5 in a few days. So far there are not behavior changes requested in Dan's feedback. Should I keep this patch 01/12 within the series for v5 or should I send it separately ? Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. https://www.efficios.com
