Calls to vfs_setlease() from NFSD code cause unnecessary CAP_LEASE security checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

In [1] a user reports seeing SELinux denials from NFSD when it writes
into /proc/fs/nfsd/threads with the following kernel backtrace:
 => trace_event_raw_event_selinux_audited
 => avc_audit_post_callback
 => common_lsm_audit
 => slow_avc_audit
 => cred_has_capability.isra.0
 => security_capable
 => capable
 => generic_setlease
 => destroy_unhashed_deleg
 => __destroy_client
 => nfs4_state_shutdown_net
 => nfsd_shutdown_net
 => nfsd_last_thread
 => nfsd_svc
 => write_threads
 => nfsctl_transaction_write
 => vfs_write
 => ksys_write
 => do_syscall_64
 => entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe

It seems to me that the security checks in generic_setlease() should
be skipped (at least) when called through this codepath, since the
userspace process merely writes into /proc/fs/nfsd/threads and it's
just the kernel's internal code that releases the lease as a side
effect. For example, for vfs_write() there is kernel_write(), which
provides a no-security-check equivalent. Should there be something
similar for vfs_setlease() that could be utilized for this purpose?

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248830

-- 
Ondrej Mosnacek
Senior Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel
Red Hat, Inc.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux