On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 11:41, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was considering splitting fuse_finish_open() to the first part that > can fail and the "finally" part that deals with attributes, but seeing > that this entire chunk of atomic_o_trunc code in fuse_finish_open() > is never relevant to atomic_open(), I'd rather just move it out > into fuse_open_common() which has loads of other code related to > atomic_o_trunc anyway? Yep. Thanks, Miklos
