Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > On 2024-01-31 12:17, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > So this is the third iteration and you still keep only sending patch > > 3 to the list. How is anyone supposed to review it if you don't send > > them all the pieces? > > My bad. I was aiming for not spamming mailing lists on unrelated patches. I did > not CC linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on the other patches. But the missing > context is just confusing. And I forgot to CC linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > on patch 3 as well. > > You can find the entire series on lore: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240131162533.247710-1-mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t > > I'll make sure to copy all lists for all patches in the next > round, namely: > > Cc: linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-cxl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Thanks, > > Mathieu FWIW there are some developers and lists that want all patches and there are some developers only want to see the one patch they are directly copied on. I have a locally maintained list as I have discovered these different preferences, but maybe MAINTAINERS could carry a flag to indicate this to save the next person some time?
