On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:54:30PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > sb_bread() under a RWLOCK - pointers_lock - in get_block(). Which more or > less shows nobody has run sysv in ages because otherwise the chances of > sleeping in atomic context are really high? Perhaps another candidate for > removal? I'd be fine with it, but I think Al has an attachment to it :)
