Re: Future of libfuse maintenance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 10:22, Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Nikolaus,
>
> On 1/29/24 09:56, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > [Resend as text/plain so it doesn't bounce from linux-fsdevel@]
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > The time that I have availability for libfuse maintenance is a lot less today than it was a few years ago, and I don't expect that to change.

Nikolaus, thank you for all the work you did with libfuse.  I hope you
got something in return for what you put into this project.


> I'm maintaining our DDN internal version anyway - I think I can help to
> maintain libfuse / take it over.
>
> Btw, I also think that kernel fuse needs a maintenance team - I think
> currently patches are getting forgotten about - I'm planning to set up
> my own fuse-bernd-next branch with patches, which I think should be
> considered - I just didn't get to that yet.

I hope to have a little more time for review in the coming weeks, but
this is a good idea regardless.

Thanks,
Miklos




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux