[PATCH 1/9] udf: Remove GFP_NOFS from dir iteration code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Directory iteration code was using GFP_NOFS allocations in two places.
However the code is called only under inode->i_rwsem which is generally
safe wrt reclaim. So we can do the allocations with GFP_KERNEL instead.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/udf/dir.c   | 2 +-
 fs/udf/namei.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/udf/dir.c b/fs/udf/dir.c
index f6533f93851b..f94f45fe2c91 100644
--- a/fs/udf/dir.c
+++ b/fs/udf/dir.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int udf_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
 		pos_valid = true;
 	}
 
-	fname = kmalloc(UDF_NAME_LEN, GFP_NOFS);
+	fname = kmalloc(UDF_NAME_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!fname) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
diff --git a/fs/udf/namei.c b/fs/udf/namei.c
index 1bb6ed948927..1f14a0621a91 100644
--- a/fs/udf/namei.c
+++ b/fs/udf/namei.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static int udf_fiiter_find_entry(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *child,
 		child->name[0] == '.' && child->name[1] == '.';
 	int ret;
 
-	fname = kmalloc(UDF_NAME_LEN, GFP_NOFS);
+	fname = kmalloc(UDF_NAME_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!fname)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.35.3





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux