Re: [PATCH] bcachefs: fix incorrect usage of REQ_OP_FLUSH

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 06:38:09PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 12:37:10PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > Ahh - I misread the bug report (fedora puts out kernels before rc1!?).
> > Thanks, your patch is back in :)
> 
> Please throw it in your test setup and watch the results carefully.
> I'm pretty sure it is correct, but I do not actually have a way to
> verify it right now.

updating my tests for the MD_FAULTY removal, then will do. Is there
anything you want me to look for?

considering most tests won't break or won't clearly break if flush/fua
is being dropped (even generic/388 was passing reliably, of course,
since virtual block devices aren't going to reorder writes...) maybe we
could do some print statement sanity checking...




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux