Re: [PATCH 07/17] vfs: Introduce new helpers for syncing after writing to O_SYNC file or IS_SYNC inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> int generic_write_sync(struct file *file, loff_t pos, loff_t count)
> {
> 	if (!(file->f_flags & O_SYNC) && !IS_SYNC(file->f_mapping->host))
> 		return 0;
> 	return vfs_fsync_range(file, file->f_path.dentry, pos,
> 			       pos + count - 1, 1);
> }
> 
> and we can look into replacing the datasync flag with something more
> meaningfull later through the whole fsync stack.

I like that.  It looks really clear and self-documenting, if
vfs_fsync_range does what it sounds like, which is a nice change.

If I've guessed right what that code does, proper O_RSYNC will be easy:

int generic_sync_before_read(struct file *file, loff_t pos, loff_t count)
{
	int is_sync = ((file->f_flags & O_SYNC)
		       || IS_SYNC(file->f_mapping->host));
	int is_dsync = is_sync || (file->f_flags & O_DSYNC);

	if (!is_dsync || !(file->f_flags & O_RSYNC))
		return 0;
	return vfs_fsync_range(file, file->f_ath.denty, pos,
			       pos + count - 1, is_sync);
}

(By the way, did I mention Irix has range-fsync and range-fdatasync
system calls too :-) (actually fcntls))

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux