On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 09:51:47AM +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > Hi, > > It seems there is consensus to remove it so please add: Well, we'll try. This is one of those cases where we might end up not being able to do it. But imho this is a case where there's sufficient reason to at least try and remove this code precisely because we have an alternative implementation that's been around for a while. IOW, this isn't like reiserfs where we're actually getting rid of a filesystem completely.
