On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 05:26:55PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:30:54PM +0100, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote: > > > + * If all buffers on a folio have zero reference count, are clean > > > + * and unlocked, and if the folio is clean and unlocked then > > > > IIUC from your [PATCH 3/8], folio only needs to be unlocked to free the > > buffers as try_to_free_buffers() will remove the dirty flag and "clean" > > the folio? > > So: > > s/if folio is clean and unlocked/if folio is unlocked > > That's a good point. Perhaps "unlocked and not under writeback" > would be better wording, since that would be true. Yeah. That sounds good to me!
