Re: [PATCH] Revert "fsnotify: optionally pass access range in file permission hooks"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/9/24 10:30 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:08:40AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> This reverts commit d9e5d31084b024734e64307521414ef0ae1d5333.
>>
>> This commit added an extra fsnotify call from rw_verify_area(), which
>> can be a very hot path. In my testing, this adds roughly 5-6% extra
>> overhead per IO, which is quite a lot. As a result, throughput of
>> said test also drops by 5-6%, as it is CPU bound. Looking at perf,
>> it's apparent why:
>>
>>      3.36%             [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] fsnotify
>>      2.32%             [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __fsnotify_paren
>>
>> which directly correlates with performance lost.
>>
>> As the rationale for this patch isn't very strong, revert this commit
>> for now and reclaim the performance.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
> 
> Thanks for tracking this down! I think Amir, you, and I came to the
> conclusion that we can fix this in without having to revert. Amir is
> sending out a new patch later tonight. I'll get that fixed by the end of
> the week.

Yep, either revert or that patch fixes things for me.

-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux