On Mon 18-12-23 15:40:42, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On 18.12.23 16:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:41:27AM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > >>> although I had some reason to be careful back then. hfsplus should > >>> be testable again that the hfsplus Linux port is back alive. Is there > >>> any volunteer to test hfsplus on the fsdevel list? > >> > >> What do you have in mind on that side? "Just" running it through fstests > >> and see that we don't regress here or more than that? > > > > Yeah. Back in the day I ran hfsplus through xfstests, IIRC that might > > even have been the initial motivation for supporting file systems > > that don't support sparse files. I bet a lot has regressed or isn't > > support since, though. > > > > Let me see what I can do on that front over my winter vacation. As long > as there's no APFS support in Linux its the only way to exchange data > between macOS and Linux anyways, so we shouldn't break it. AFAIK macOS actually does support UDF so there are other filesystems you can use for data exchange. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
