On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:29:50PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > Hi Luis and Julia, > > (Julia, there is a question and context for you inline, marked with your name) > > On 2023-12-18 13:21:49-0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > So we can split this up concentually in two: > > > > * constificaiton of the table handlers > > * constification of the table struct itself <--- snip ---> > > case but to any place in the kernel where this previously has been done > > before, and hence my suggestion that this seems like a sensible thing > > to think over to see if we could generalize. > > I'd like to split the series and submit the part up until and including > the constification of arguments first and on its own. > It keeps the subsystem maintainers out of the discussion of the core > sysctl changes. quick comment : Note that if this contains the tree-wide patches, it will inevitably bring in the rest of the maintainers. > > I'll submit the core sysctl changes after I figure out proper responses > to all review comments and we can do this in parallel to the tree-wide > preparation. > > What do you think Luis and Joel? Separating all this into patch series that have a defined motivation and that are self contained is the way to go IMO. Best > > [0] https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=0ddcce36-6d3e536b-0ddd4579-000babd9f1ba-c68841e97c452963&q=1&e=d70f9b65-8465-4489-b777-b13eb1ffc99b&u=https%3A%2F%2Frepo.or.cz%2Fsmatch.git%2Fblob%2FHEAD%3A%2Fsmatch_scripts%2Ftest_kernel.sh -- Joel Granados
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
