On 12/20/23 13:29, Al Viro wrote:
__dentry_leases_walk() is gets a callback and calls it for
a bunch of denties; there are exactly two callers and
we already have a flag telling them apart - lwc->dir_lease.
Seeing that indirect calls are costly these days, let's
get rid of the callback and just call the right function
directly. Has a side benefit of saner signatures...
Signed-off-by Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ceph/dir.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ceph/dir.c b/fs/ceph/dir.c
index 91709934c8b1..768158743750 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/dir.c
@@ -1593,10 +1593,12 @@ struct ceph_lease_walk_control {
unsigned long dir_lease_ttl;
};
+static int __dir_lease_check(const struct dentry *, struct ceph_lease_walk_control *);
+static int __dentry_lease_check(const struct dentry *);
+
static unsigned long
__dentry_leases_walk(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
- struct ceph_lease_walk_control *lwc,
- int (*check)(struct dentry*, void*))
+ struct ceph_lease_walk_control *lwc)
{
struct ceph_dentry_info *di, *tmp;
struct dentry *dentry, *last = NULL;
@@ -1624,7 +1626,10 @@ __dentry_leases_walk(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
goto next;
}
- ret = check(dentry, lwc);
+ if (lwc->dir_lease)
+ ret = __dir_lease_check(dentry, lwc);
+ else
+ ret = __dentry_lease_check(dentry);
if (ret & TOUCH) {
/* move it into tail of dir lease list */
__dentry_dir_lease_touch(mdsc, di);
@@ -1681,7 +1686,7 @@ __dentry_leases_walk(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
return freed;
}
-static int __dentry_lease_check(struct dentry *dentry, void *arg)
+static int __dentry_lease_check(const struct dentry *dentry)
{
struct ceph_dentry_info *di = ceph_dentry(dentry);
int ret;
@@ -1696,9 +1701,9 @@ static int __dentry_lease_check(struct dentry *dentry, void *arg)
return DELETE;
}
-static int __dir_lease_check(struct dentry *dentry, void *arg)
+static int __dir_lease_check(const struct dentry *dentry,
+ struct ceph_lease_walk_control *lwc)
{
- struct ceph_lease_walk_control *lwc = arg;
struct ceph_dentry_info *di = ceph_dentry(dentry);
int ret = __dir_lease_try_check(dentry);
@@ -1737,7 +1742,7 @@ int ceph_trim_dentries(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc)
lwc.dir_lease = false;
lwc.nr_to_scan = CEPH_CAPS_PER_RELEASE * 2;
- freed = __dentry_leases_walk(mdsc, &lwc, __dentry_lease_check);
+ freed = __dentry_leases_walk(mdsc, &lwc);
if (!lwc.nr_to_scan) /* more invalid leases */
return -EAGAIN;
@@ -1747,7 +1752,7 @@ int ceph_trim_dentries(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc)
lwc.dir_lease = true;
lwc.expire_dir_lease = freed < count;
lwc.dir_lease_ttl = mdsc->fsc->mount_options->caps_wanted_delay_max * HZ;
- freed +=__dentry_leases_walk(mdsc, &lwc, __dir_lease_check);
+ freed +=__dentry_leases_walk(mdsc, &lwc);
if (!lwc.nr_to_scan) /* more to check */
return -EAGAIN;
Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Al,
I think these two ceph patches won't be dependent by your following
patches, right ?
If so we can apply them to ceph-client tree and run more tests.
Thanks!