Re: [PATCH 18/22] nfsd: kill stale comment about simple_fill_super() requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 05:30:13AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> That went into the tree back in 2005; the comment used to be true for
> predecessor of simple_fill_super() that happened to live in nfsd; that one
> didn't take care to skip the array entries with NULL ->name, so it could
> not tolerate any gaps.  That had been fixed in 2003 when nfsd_fill_super()
> had been abstracted into simple_fill_super(); if Neil's patch lived out
> of tree during that time, he probably replaced the name of function when
> rebasing it and didn't notice that restriction in question was no longer
> there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>


> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
> index 3e15b72f421d..26a25e40c451 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
> @@ -48,10 +48,6 @@ enum {
>  	NFSD_MaxBlkSize,
>  	NFSD_MaxConnections,
>  	NFSD_Filecache,
> -	/*
> -	 * The below MUST come last.  Otherwise we leave a hole in nfsd_files[]
> -	 * with !CONFIG_NFSD_V4 and simple_fill_super() goes oops
> -	 */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V4
>  	NFSD_Leasetime,
>  	NFSD_Gracetime,
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 

-- 
Chuck Lever




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux