Re: [PATCH v4 28/39] netfs: Implement support for unbuffered/DIO read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > +static int netfs_copy_xarray_to_iter(struct netfs_io_request *rreq,
> > +				     struct xarray *xa, struct iov_iter *dst,
> > +				     unsigned long long start, size_t avail)
> ...
> > +	xas_for_each(&xas, folio, ULONG_MAX) {
> > +		size_t offset;
> > +
> > +		if (xas_retry(&xas, folio))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		/* There shouldn't be a need to call xas_pause() as no one else
> > +		 * should be modifying the xarray we're iterating over.
> > +		 * Really, we only need the RCU readlock to keep lockdep happy
> > +		 * inside xas_for_each().
> > +		 */
> > +		rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> 
> Are you sure it's still safe to access "folio" once you've dropped the
> rcu_read_lock? I wonder if you need to take a reference or something.
> 
> I guess if this is a "private" xarray then nothing should be modifying
> it?

It is a private xarray in this case.  The only reason I need the RCU read lock
is because the xarray code will complain if we're not holding it:-/.

Actually, I can probably excise the bounce buffer code for this series as
nothing in 9p or afs currently uses it.  It's needed for content crypto - so
ceph will need it.

David





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux