On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:05 PM Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I spoke to Miguel about this and it was my understanding that everything > was in place for moving Rust wrappers to the proper directory - > previously there was build system stuff blocking, but he said that's all > working now. Perhaps the memo just didn't get passed down? No, it is being worked on (please see my sibling reply). > (My vote would actually be for fs/ directly, not fs/rust, and a 1:1 > mapping between .c files and the .rs files that wrap them). Thanks Kent for voting :) Though note that an exact 1:1 mapping is going to be hard, e.g. consider nested Rust submodules which would go in folders or abstractions that you may arrange differently even if they wrap the same concepts. But, yeah, one should try to avoid to diverge without a good reason, of course, especially in the beginning. Cheers, Miguel
