On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 05:10:57PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > Hello, > > v3 can be found here > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1697480198.git.josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > There's been a longer delay between versions than I'd like, this was mostly due > to Plumbers, Holidays, and then uncovering a bunch of new issues with '-o > test_dummy_encryption'. I'm still working through some of the btrfs specific > failures, but the fscrypt side appears to be stable. I had to add a few changes > to fscrypt since the last time, but nothing earth shattering, just moving the > keyring destruction and adding a helper we need for btrfs send to work properly. > > This is passing a good chunk of the fstests, at this point the majority appear > to be cases where I need to exclude the test when using test_dummy_encryption > because of various limitations of our tools or other infrastructure related > things. > > I likely will have a follow-up series with more fixes, but the bulk of this is > unchanged since the last posting. There were some bug fixes and such but the > overall design remains the same. Thanks, > Well, it wouldn't be Linux kernel development without patchsets that don't mention what they apply to... I managed to apply this for reviewing after spending a while choosing the base that seemed to work best (6d3880a76eedd from kdave/for-next) and resolving conflicts. It would save a lot of time if proper information was included, though. - Eric
