On 11/30/23 15:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 02:53:35PM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote: >> On 11/29/23 13:51, Alice Ryhl wrote: >>> +/// Flags associated with a [`File`]. >>> +pub mod flags { >>> + /// File is opened in append mode. >>> + pub const O_APPEND: u32 = bindings::O_APPEND; >> >> Why do all of these constants begin with `O_`? > > Because that is how they are defined in the kernel in the C code. Why > would they not be the same here? Then why does the C side name them that way? Is it because `O_*` is supposed to mean something, or is it done due to namespacing? In Rust we have namespacing, so we generally drop common prefixes. -- Cheers, Benno