By now there is only one place in entire fast_dput() where we return false; that happens after refcount had been decremented and found (under ->d_lock) to be zero. In that case, just prior to returning false to caller, fast_dput() forcibly changes the refcount from 0 to 1. Lift that resetting refcount to 1 into the callers; later in the series it will be massaged out of existence. Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/dcache.c | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c index 9edabc7e2e64..a00e9ba22480 100644 --- a/fs/dcache.c +++ b/fs/dcache.c @@ -847,13 +847,6 @@ static inline bool fast_dput(struct dentry *dentry) spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); return true; } - - /* - * Re-get the reference we optimistically dropped. We hold the - * lock, and we just tested that it was zero, so we can just - * set it to 1. - */ - dentry->d_lockref.count = 1; return false; } @@ -896,6 +889,7 @@ void dput(struct dentry *dentry) } /* Slow case: now with the dentry lock held */ + dentry->d_lockref.count = 1; rcu_read_unlock(); if (likely(retain_dentry(dentry))) { @@ -930,6 +924,7 @@ void dput_to_list(struct dentry *dentry, struct list_head *list) return; } rcu_read_unlock(); + dentry->d_lockref.count = 1; if (!retain_dentry(dentry)) __dput_to_list(dentry, list); spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock); -- 2.39.2