On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 05:08:01PM -0800, Anish Moorthy wrote: > Applying [1] and [2] reveals that this also breaks non-x86 builds- the > MEM_REGION_GPA/SLOT definitions are guarded behind an #ifdef > __x86_64__, while the usages introduced here aren't. > > Should > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 8:35 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > + test_invalid_memory_region_flags(); > > be #ifdef'd, perhaps? I'm not quite sure what the intent is. This has been broken in -next for a week now, do we have any progress on a fix or should we just revert the patch?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature