+static bool check_options(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, unsigned long flags) +{ + if (!(flags & SB_RDONLY) && + (check_ro_option(info, BTRFS_MOUNT_NOLOGREPLAY, "nologreplay") || + check_ro_option(info, BTRFS_MOUNT_IGNOREBADROOTS, "ignorebadroots") || + check_ro_option(info, BTRFS_MOUNT_IGNOREDATACSUMS, "ignoredatacsums"))) + return false; + + if (btrfs_fs_compat_ro(info, FREE_SPACE_TREE) && + !btrfs_test_opt(info, FREE_SPACE_TREE) && + !btrfs_test_opt(info, CLEAR_CACHE)) { + btrfs_err(info, "cannot disable free space tree"); + return false; + } + if (btrfs_fs_compat_ro(info, BLOCK_GROUP_TREE) && + !btrfs_test_opt(info, FREE_SPACE_TREE)) { + btrfs_err(info, "cannot disable free space tree with block-group-tree feature"); + return false; + } + + if (btrfs_check_mountopts_zoned(info)) + return false; +
<snip>
-check: - /* We're read-only, don't have to check. */ - if (new_flags & SB_RDONLY) - goto out; - - if (check_ro_option(info, BTRFS_MOUNT_NOLOGREPLAY, "nologreplay") || - check_ro_option(info, BTRFS_MOUNT_IGNOREBADROOTS, "ignorebadroots") || - check_ro_option(info, BTRFS_MOUNT_IGNOREDATACSUMS, "ignoredatacsums")) - ret = -EINVAL; out: - if (btrfs_fs_compat_ro(info, FREE_SPACE_TREE) && - !btrfs_test_opt(info, FREE_SPACE_TREE) && - !btrfs_test_opt(info, CLEAR_CACHE)) { - btrfs_err(info, "cannot disable free space tree"); + if (!ret && !check_options(info, new_flags)) ret = -EINVAL; - } - if (btrfs_fs_compat_ro(info, BLOCK_GROUP_TREE) && - !btrfs_test_opt(info, FREE_SPACE_TREE)) { - btrfs_err(info, "cannot disable free space tree with block-group-tree feature"); - ret = -EINVAL; - } - if (!ret) - ret = btrfs_check_mountopts_zoned(info); - if (!ret && !remounting) { - if (btrfs_test_opt(info, SPACE_CACHE)) - btrfs_info(info, "disk space caching is enabled"); - if (btrfs_test_opt(info, FREE_SPACE_TREE)) - btrfs_info(info, "using free space tree"); - } return ret; }
Before this patch, we verified all the above checks simultaneously. Now, for each error, we return without checking the rest. As a result, if there are multiple failures in the above checks, we report them sequentially. This is not a bug, but the optimization we had earlier has been traded off for cleaner code. IMO it is good to keep the optimization. Thanks, Anand