Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit: 8de1e7afcc1c Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=136e2560e80000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3e6feaeda5dcbc27 dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=83693dbba860b4f2e549 compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40 userspace arch: arm64 Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet. Downloadable assets: disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/0f00907f9764/disk-8de1e7af.raw.xz vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/0502fe78c60d/vmlinux-8de1e7af.xz kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/192135168cc0/Image-8de1e7af.gz.xz IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+83693dbba860b4f2e549@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx REISERFS (device loop5): Using tea hash to sort names REISERFS (device loop5): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.6.0-rc7-syzkaller-g8de1e7afcc1c #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.5/10863 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00012f979d60 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#18){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline] ffff00012f979d60 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#18){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: chmod_common+0x17c/0x418 fs/open.c:637 but task is already holding lock: ffff00012d90a410 (sb_writers#26){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x44/0x9c fs/namespace.c:403 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (sb_writers#26){.+.+}-{0:0}: percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1571 [inline] sb_start_write+0x60/0x2ec include/linux/fs.h:1646 mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:447 reiserfs_ioctl+0x188/0x42c fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:857 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:857 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155 el0_svc+0x54/0x158 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595 -> #1 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 reiserfs_lookup+0x128/0x45c fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364 __lookup_slow+0x250/0x374 fs/namei.c:1694 lookup_one_len+0x178/0x28c fs/namei.c:2746 reiserfs_lookup_privroot+0x8c/0x184 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:977 reiserfs_fill_super+0x1bc0/0x2028 fs/reiserfs/super.c:2174 mount_bdev+0x1e8/0x2b4 fs/super.c:1629 get_super_block+0x44/0x58 fs/reiserfs/super.c:2601 legacy_get_tree+0xd4/0x16c fs/fs_context.c:662 vfs_get_tree+0x90/0x288 fs/super.c:1750 do_new_mount+0x25c/0x8c8 fs/namespace.c:3335 path_mount+0x590/0xe04 fs/namespace.c:3662 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline] __arm64_sys_mount+0x45c/0x594 fs/namespace.c:3861 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155 el0_svc+0x54/0x158 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595 -> #0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#18){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3370/0x75e8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5136 lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5753 down_write+0x50/0xc0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline] chmod_common+0x17c/0x418 fs/open.c:637 vfs_fchmod fs/open.c:659 [inline] __do_sys_fchmod fs/open.c:668 [inline] __se_sys_fchmod fs/open.c:662 [inline] __arm64_sys_fchmod+0xe0/0x150 fs/open.c:662 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155 el0_svc+0x54/0x158 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &type->i_mutex_dir_key#18 --> &sbi->lock --> sb_writers#26 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(sb_writers#26); lock(&sbi->lock); lock(sb_writers#26); lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#18); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.5/10863: #0: ffff00012d90a410 (sb_writers#26){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x44/0x9c fs/namespace.c:403 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 10863 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc7-syzkaller-g8de1e7afcc1c #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/09/2023 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x1b8/0x1e4 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:233 show_stack+0x2c/0x44 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:240 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd0/0x124 lib/dump_stack.c:106 dump_stack+0x1c/0x28 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_circular_bug+0x150/0x1b8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2060 check_noncircular+0x310/0x404 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3370/0x75e8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5136 lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5753 down_write+0x50/0xc0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:802 [inline] chmod_common+0x17c/0x418 fs/open.c:637 vfs_fchmod fs/open.c:659 [inline] __do_sys_fchmod fs/open.c:668 [inline] __se_sys_fchmod fs/open.c:662 [inline] __arm64_sys_fchmod+0xe0/0x150 fs/open.c:662 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155 el0_svc+0x54/0x158 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595 netlink: 12 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.5'. netlink: 32 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz-executor.5'. --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with: #syz fix: exact-commit-title If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with: #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard) If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with: #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report If you want to undo deduplication, reply with: #syz undup
