On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 09:45:37PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 06:20:08PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > It's a bit unfortunate that __lock_parent() locks the parent *and* may > > lock the child which isn't really obvious from the name. It just becomes > > clear that this is assumed by how callers release the child's lock. > > __lock_parent() is gone by the end of the series. Yes, I saw that once I got to the end of the series. Thanks.
