Re: [PATCH v13 09/35] KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit to report faults to userspace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/2/2023 1:36 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
KVM_CAP_MEMORY_FAULT_INFO is x86 only, is it better to put this function to
<asm/kvm_host.h>?
I'd prefer to keep it in generic code, as it's highly likely to end up there
sooner than later.  There's a known use case for ARM (exit to userspace on missing
userspace mapping[*]), and I'm guessing pKVM (also ARM) will also utilize this API.

[*]https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908222905.1321305-8-amoorthy@xxxxxxxxxx

I wonder how this CAP is supposed to be checked in userspace, for guest memfd case? something like this?

	if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_MEMORY_FAULT_INFO) &&
	    run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT)
		abort("unexpected KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT");

In my implementation of QEMU patches, I find it's unnecessary. When userspace gets an exit with KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT, it implies "KVM_CAP_MEMORY_FAULT_INFO".

So I don't see how it is necessary in this series. Whether it's necessary or not for [*], I don't have the answer but we can leave the discussion to that patch series.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux