On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 11:13 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023, Fuad Tabba wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 7:23 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Since we now know that at least pKVM will use guest_memfd for shared memory, and > odds are quite good that "regular" VMs will also do the same, i.e. will want > guest_memfd with the concept of private memory, I agree that we should avoid > PRIVATE. > > Though I vote for KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD (or KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD_VALID or > KVM_MEM_USE_GUEST_MEMFD). I.e. do our best to avoid ambiguity between referring > to "guest memory" at-large and guest_memfd. I was going to propose KVM_MEM_HAS_GUESTMEMFD. Any option is okay for me so, if no one complains, I'll go for KVM_MEM_GUESTMEMFD (no underscore because I found the repeated "_MEM" distracting). Paolo
