On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 13:31, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Current patch set does not implement "backing inode" for FUSE inode, What prevents us from storing a fuse_backing reference in fuse_inode while the file(s) are open? AFAICS it just needs a counter in fuse_inode to account the number of open instances. Thanks, Miklos