Hi Christian, On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 16:02:33 +0200 Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The vfs.super tree originally contained a good chunk of the btrfs tree > as a merge - as mentioned elsewhere - since we had intended to depend on > work that Christoph did a few months ago. We had allowed btrfs to carry > the patches themselves. > > But it since became clear that btrfs/for-next likely does not contain > any of the patches there's zero reason for the original merge. So the > merge is dropped. It's not great because it's a late change but it's > better than bringing in a completely pointless merge. Can you please update what you are including in linux-next to match what you are asking Linus to merge. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgphl8VjULM33.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
