On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 09:43:01AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > Presumable the same for fuse, but for that > > I'd need to look at how it works for fuse right now and if there's not > > some subtle differences. > > > > There are subtle differences: > 1. fuse encodes an internal nodeid - not i_ino > 2. fuse encodes the inode number as [low32,high32] > > It cannot use the generic helper. That's what I almost feared. It still should use the common symbolic name for the format just to make everyones life simpler.