On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 09:33:19AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > OK. You are blaming me for attempting to sneak in a broken feature > and I have blamed you for trying take my patches hostage to > promote your agenda. I'm not blaming you for anything. But I absolutely reject spreading this broken behavior to core. That's why there is hard NAK on this patchs. > > If that is the case, fanotify will need to continue reporting the fsid's > exactly as the user observes them on the legacy btrfs filesystems. > The v2 patches I posted are required to make that possible. The point is tht you simply can't use fanotify on a btrfs file system with the broken behavior. That's what btrfs gets for doing this broken behavior to start with.
