Re: How to handle >16TB devices on 32 bit hosts ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 09:48:11AM +0200, Andi Kleen (andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 02:52:13AM -0400, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > If you aren't running a 32-bit system with this config, you shouldn't
> > really care.  For those systems that need to run in this mode they
> > would rather have it work a few percent slower instead of not at all.
> 
> Well, it doesn't work at all anyways due to the fsck problem.

I can imagine several scenarios where 16TB+ raid would be useful
without any filesystems bigger than 2TB.
Or does LVM have problems with 16TB+ devices in 32bit-systems, too?

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux