Re: [PATCH v2 28/39] timekeeping: Fix a circular include dependency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 28/39] timekeeping: Fix a circular include dependency
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 19:33:00 +0200
Cc: kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx, mhocko@xxxxxxxx, vbabka@xxxxxxx, hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx, roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx, willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, liam.howlett@xxxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx, ldufour@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, arnd@xxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, peterx@xxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx, masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx, nathan@xxxxxxxxxx, dennis@xxxxxxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, muchun.song@xxxxxxxxx, rppt@xxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx, yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx, yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx, dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, hughd@xxxxxxxxxx, andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx, vvvvvv@xxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx, ytcoode@xxxxxxxxx, vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx, dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx, bristot@xxxxxxxxxx, vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx, cl@xxxxxxxxx, penberg@xxxxxxxxxx, iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx, 42.hyeyoo@xxxxxxxxx, glider@xxxxxxxxxx, elver@xxxxxxxxxx, dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx, shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx, songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx, rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx, minchan@xxxxxxxxxx, kaleshsingh@xxxxxxxxxx, surenb@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-modules@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kasan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20231024134637.3120277-29-surenb@google.com>

On Tue, Oct 24 2023 at 06:46, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This avoids a circular header dependency in an upcoming patch by only
> making hrtimer.h depend on percpu-defs.h

What's the actual dependency problem?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 28/39] timekeeping: Fix a circular include dependency
  - From: Suren Baghdasaryan

References:
- [PATCH v2 00/39] Memory allocation profiling
  - From: Suren Baghdasaryan
- [PATCH v2 28/39] timekeeping: Fix a circular include dependency
  - From: Suren Baghdasaryan

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] fs,block: yield devices
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fanotify support for btrfs sub-volumes
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2 28/39] timekeeping: Fix a circular include dependency
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 28/39] timekeeping: Fix a circular include dependency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]