Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Targeting 6.7 is fine by me. will you pick it up through the vfs tree? I >> prefer it goes through there since it mostly touches vfs. > > Yes, I think that's what will end up happening. Hi Christian, Sorry for the ping again, but I got a question about your process. I noticed this patchset did not make into linux-next in preparation for the 6.7 merge request. It also doesn't show in your vfs.all, but an older iteration (definitely not the v6 that Eric acked) exists in a vfs.dcache.casefold branch. Is this expected and I'm missing something? I considered this applied but I might have misunderstood. Please let me know if you need me to rebase. -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
