[PATCH v10 6/8] fuse: Return D_REVALIDATE_ATOMIC for cached dentries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Cached dentries do not get revalidate, but open would still result in
open + getattr, instead of one atomic_open call only.

libfuse logs (passthrough_hp):

Unpatched:
----------
unique: 22, opcode: OPEN (14), nodeid: 140698229673544, insize: 48, pid: 3434
   unique: 22, success, outsize: 32
unique: 24, opcode: GETATTR (3), nodeid: 140698229673544, insize: 56, pid: 3434
   unique: 24, success, outsize: 120
unique: 26, opcode: FLUSH (25), nodeid: 140698229673544, insize: 64, pid: 3434
   unique: 26, success, outsize: 16
unique: 28, opcode: RELEASE (18), nodeid: 140698229673544, insize: 64, pid: 0
   unique: 28, success, outsize: 16

Patched:
----------
unique: 20, opcode: OPEN_ATOMIC (52), nodeid: 1, insize: 63, pid: 3397
   unique: 20, success, outsize: 160
unique: 22, opcode: FLUSH (25), nodeid: 140024188243528, insize: 64, pid: 3397
   unique: 22, success, outsize: 16
unique: 24, opcode: RELEASE (18), nodeid: 140024188243528, insize: 64, pid: 0
   unique: 24, success, outsize: 16

Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dharmendra Singh <dsingh@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Horst Birthelmer <hbirthelmer@xxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
 fs/fuse/dir.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
index 17ae788776db..a770c0a6e022 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
@@ -183,6 +183,22 @@ static void fuse_lookup_init(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_args *args,
 	args->out_args[0].value = outarg;
 }
 
+/*
+ * If open atomic is supported by FUSE then use this opportunity
+ * to avoid this lookup and combine lookup + open into a single call.
+ */
+static int fuse_dentry_do_atomic_revalidate(struct dentry *entry,
+					     unsigned int flags,
+					     struct fuse_conn *fc)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (flags & LOOKUP_OPEN && fc->has_open_atomic)
+		ret = D_REVALIDATE_ATOMIC;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Check whether the dentry is still valid
  *
@@ -220,19 +236,10 @@ static int fuse_dentry_revalidate(struct dentry *entry, unsigned int flags)
 
 		fm = get_fuse_mount(inode);
 
-		/* If open atomic is supported by FUSE then use this opportunity
-		 * to avoid this lookup and combine lookup + open into a single call.
-		 *
-		 * Note: Fuse detects open atomic implementation automatically.
-		 * Therefore first few call would go into open atomic code path
-		 * , detects that open atomic is implemented or not by setting
-		 * fc->no_open_atomic. In case open atomic is not implemented,
-		 * calls fall back to non-atomic open.
-		 */
-		if (fm->fc->has_open_atomic && flags & LOOKUP_OPEN) {
-			ret = D_REVALIDATE_ATOMIC;
+		ret = fuse_dentry_do_atomic_revalidate(entry, flags, fm->fc);
+		if (ret)
 			goto out;
-		}
+
 		forget = fuse_alloc_forget();
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		if (!forget)
@@ -275,6 +282,16 @@ static int fuse_dentry_revalidate(struct dentry *entry, unsigned int flags)
 	} else if (inode) {
 		fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
 		if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
+			fm = get_fuse_mount(inode);
+			if (fm->fc->has_open_atomic) {
+				/* Atomic open is preferred, as it does entry
+				 * revalidate and attribute refresh, but
+				 * DCACHE_ATOMIC_OPEN cannot be set in RCU mode
+				 */
+				if (flags & LOOKUP_OPEN)
+					return -ECHILD;
+			}
+
 			if (test_bit(FUSE_I_INIT_RDPLUS, &fi->state))
 				return -ECHILD;
 		} else if (test_and_clear_bit(FUSE_I_INIT_RDPLUS, &fi->state)) {
@@ -282,6 +299,14 @@ static int fuse_dentry_revalidate(struct dentry *entry, unsigned int flags)
 			fuse_advise_use_readdirplus(d_inode(parent));
 			dput(parent);
 		}
+
+		/* revalidate is skipped, but we still want atomic open to
+		 * update attributes during open
+		 */
+		fm = get_fuse_mount(inode);
+		ret = fuse_dentry_do_atomic_revalidate(entry, flags, fm->fc);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out;
 	}
 	ret = D_REVALIDATE_VALID;
 out:
-- 
2.39.2





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux