Re: [PATCH] fs: Avoid grabbing sb->s_umount under bdev->bd_holder_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Avoid grabbing sb->s_umount under bdev->bd_holder_lock
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 06:40:27 -0700
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20231019-galopp-zeltdach-b14b7727f269@brauner>

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:33:36AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> some device removal. I also messed around with the loop code and
> specifically used LOOP_CHANGE_FD to force a disk_force_media_change() on
> a filesystem.

Can you wire that up for either blktests or xfstests as well?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Avoid grabbing sb->s_umount under bdev->bd_holder_lock
  - From: Christian Brauner

References:
- [PATCH] fs: Avoid grabbing sb->s_umount under bdev->bd_holder_lock
  - From: Jan Kara
- Re: [PATCH] fs: Avoid grabbing sb->s_umount under bdev->bd_holder_lock
  - From: Christian Brauner

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] rust: fs: introduce `FileSystem::read_xattr`
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fanotify: limit reporting of event with non-decodeable file handles
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs: Avoid grabbing sb->s_umount under bdev->bd_holder_lock
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs: Avoid grabbing sb->s_umount under bdev->bd_holder_lock
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux